Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Mono Black Demons | capitano_cl | 6-2 | None |
Dimir Midrange , Golgari Midrange , Grixis Crimes , Mono Black , Mono Black Demons , Orzhov Pixie , Rakdos Cauldron , Rakdos Lizards , Rakdos Outlaws , Unclassified
Vadmir, New Blood ranks #1672 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 33%).
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Vadmir, New Blood is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 5.31 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Vadmir, New Blood has a win rate of 53.1%, making it 11.8% better than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 5 | 55.9% | 2 |
Duress | Sorcery | 9 | 51.7% | 2 |
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 8 | 50.9% | 2 |
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 5 | 42.9% | 2 |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 11 | 42.3% | 2 |
Cut Down | Instant | 12 | 37.7% | 2 |
Kaervek, the Punisher | Legendary Creature — Human Warlock | 6 | 30.6% | 0 |
Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 6 | 30.6% | 0 |
Deep-Cavern Bat | Creature — Bat | 7 | 29.8% | 0 |
Laughing Jasper Flint | Legendary Creature — Lizard Rogue | 5 | 19.4% | 0 |
Cards that perform better with Vadmir, New Blood than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Mono Black Demons | 3 | 1.6% | 56.0% |
Rakdos Cauldron | 3 | 37.5% | 85.7% |
Unclassified | 2 | 1.0% | 23.6% |
Mono Black | 2 | 11.8% | 0.0% |
Golgari Midrange | 1 | 0.1% | 33.3% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.